Archive for the ‘franklin mortgage’ Category

Why does Yahoo! NOT REPORT bad news about Obama’s financial advisors?

June 4, 2010 - 10:17 pm 7 Comments

Is Yahoo! really so onesided as to not have the decency to report the bad about Obama? Three of his Economic Advisors, Franklin Raines, Tim Howard and Jim Johnson were senior execs at Fanni Mae where they caused huge damage to our economy by pushing bad mortgages to people without the stability to pay them off. In so doing, they received enormous benefit packages and golden parachutes. Is Yahoo! part of the snakeoil sales team or are you going to start reporting the bad along with the good.

SNAKE OIL – honey they just drank the kool aid! don’t blame them all – it’s only a hand ful!

How does McCain keep his nose from growing? (i.e. Frank Raines allegations)?

June 4, 2010 - 10:17 pm 4 Comments

"Obama has no background in economics. Who advises him? The Post says it’s Franklin Raines, for "advice on mortgage and housing policy." Shocking. Under Raines, Fannie Mae committed "extensive financial fraud." Raines made millions. Fannie Mae collapsed. Taxpayers? Stuck with the bill."
–McCain video release, September 18, 2008.

Fact Check from Washington Post
McCain is lying

http://voices.washingtonpost.com/fact-checker/2008/09/obamas_fannie_mae_connection.html

I guess I want to hear from McCain supporters. Do you think this level of disengenuousness is appropriate/fair? Do you think that Obama would or has stooped to this level? (cite reference)

If the Frank Raines connection lie isn’t big enough. We could talk about the Sex Ed commercial? That was pretty slimey on McCain’s part.
Provobis, you could blame it on the Post being liberal, except the quote is from Raines himself!
You give the impression of being blinded by your partisanship.

True his nose is getting so long you could hang laundry form it. He must eat a diet high in chlorophyll and nitrogen. Due to the rate at which it is growing – I suggest frequent trimming – such as by power tool – a small 5" circular saw for example. Dremel is too small and might poke the old coot in the eye and reciprocating saw too large may be overkill(??) plus send shocks Viet Cong flashing back which might be a little cruel(?) — and then he might go off into one of his rages and push another helpless handicapped person out of her wheel chair.

All this give me ideas for political cartoons :-) )

the bloated welfare states of France and Sweden have lower corporate rates and generally better corporate tax?

June 4, 2010 - 10:17 pm 5 Comments

Now that recession-warning lights have begun to blink, Democrats should give tax hikes a rest.
As tax-happy Democrats might have noticed, the stock market resembles a kindergartner on a swing set: half-giddy, half-scared, and hyperactive. Meanwhile, payrolls sagged by 4,000 positions last month. Not since August 2003 has America created no new jobs. Fifty-two economists in September 13’s Wall Street Journal offered a 36-percent average probability of recession by next September, up from 28-percent in August.

Oil hit $81.93 per-barrel Wednesday — hardly good news. And the tumultuous home-mortgage industry suffered 243,497 foreclosure listings last month, up 115-percent versus August 2006, RealtyTrac.com reports. This mess triggered 12,000 layoffs, just at lender Countrywide Financial Corp. To prevent tight credit from suffocating the economy, the Federal Reserve Board Tuesday hastily administered a 0.5-percent federal-funds-rate reduction.

Amid these worrisome omens and genuine human suffering, the last thing America needs is for congressional Democrats to stuff a pillow over the economy’s face. But they can’t control themselves.

“Through 2012, the Democratic Congress’ new budget raises taxes $217 billion,” the National Taxpayers Union’s Pete Sepp calculates. “If no surpluses appear that year, another $175.5 billion tax hike automatically kicks in.”
This $392.5 billion includes a halving of the per-child tax credit, restoration of the marriage penalty, a 50-percent leap in the low-income tax bracket (10-percent under Republicans; 15-percent under Democrats), and the resurrection of the Death Tax — from 0 to 55-percent.

After August’s tragic Minneapolis bridge collapse, House Transportation chairman James Oberstar (D., Minn.) proposed a “temporary” nickel-a-gallon federal gasoline-tax increase. Never mind that existing gas-tax revenues vanish into narcissistic pork projects rather than urgent infrastructure repairs. Such a tax hike would “cost American motorists an estimated $25 billion over the next three years,” NTU reckons.

Democrats cannot plea that soaring deficits require tax hikes to absorb red ink. Indeed, the federal budget gap narrowed from $413 billion in 2004 to $158 billion today, proving that the best deficit medicine nearly always is to limit taxes and consequently unleash American enterprise. A thinner federal slice of a bigger economic pie usually yields revenues exceeding pre-tax-cut levels.

Federal receipts have zoomed 7-percent this year. “The tax cuts are working exactly as intended,” Heritage Foundation analyst Brian Riedl argues. “Lower tax rates have increased the incentives to work, save, and invest, and as a result, the economy has grown faster than expected.” He adds: “Concerns that the Bush tax cuts would lead to a long-term shortfall of government revenues have proven false …Tax revenues in 2007 are now estimated to be $70 billion above the level projected even before the 2003 tax cuts. In other words, tax revenues are now above their pre-tax cut baseline.”

Democrats cannot deny what happened after President Bush and Capitol Hill Republicans slashed maximum capital-gains taxes from 18 to 15-percent in 2003. Rather than dwindle $5.37 billion between 2003 and 2006, as the congressional Joint Tax Committee’s antique, static-analysis model wrongly predicted, revenues actually advanced $53 billion.

Foreign economic ministers understand these lessons and are lowering taxes as if Franklin Roosevelt never lived and Ronald Reagan never died.

“Sweden and Russia last year eliminated their estate taxes because they said the tax was economically counterproductive,” economist Stephen Moore wrote in the August 31 Wall Street Journal. “In Germany under Chancellor Angela Merkel, the corporate tax rate has been reduced to less than 30 percent from 39-percent.” Poland recently chopped its business tax from 27-percent to 19.

Even Hanoi gets it! Thanks to corporate-tax relief, “the business environment will become more and more attractive, resulting in increased investment,” Vietnamese tax chief Nguyen Van Ninh told Moore.

While America’s corporate tax levitates at 35-percent, seven European Union nations have lowered business levies this year. The EU-average corporate tax is 24.2-percent.

“Further corporate tax rate cuts are being implemented in Germany, Estonia, Spain, and the United Kingdom, and rate cuts are being discussed in the Czech Republic and France,” observes Cato Institute senior fellow Dan Mitchell. “Even the bloated welfare states of France and Sweden have lower corporate rates and generally better corporate tax systems than America.”

Democrats thus resist global pro-market trends, even among progressive governments long on social solidarity and short on “reckless cowboyism.”

But, for most Democrats, these facts and numbers are irrelevant. Taxes are not about merely funding vital government duties and basic public services. They are meant to punish the wealthy, “correct” personal behavior, and distribute universal largesse. Thus, Democrats itch to raise taxes on highly lucrative private-equity partnerships, from 15 to 35-percent.

True to form, the Democratic Senate voted in August to hike cigarette taxes 156 percent, from 39 cents to $1 per pack. This would ignite a massive explosion in the State Child Health Insurance Program. The Democratic House extended government medicine to kids in families of four earning quadruple the Federal Poverty Line, or $82,600 — twice today’s threshold. The House also redefined “child” as an eligible boy or girl …up to age 25.

While America’s economy clings from a ledge, Democrats dance on its fingertips. When the donkey party promises “change,” it delivers — good and hard.

that’s funny, what you call "raising taxes" i call "repealing Bush’s tax cuts for the wealthy"

isn’t it amazing how we can both be technically correct but that by saying it this or that way one can give it a really good spin?

Buy a home versus rent? Full-time college student w/ part-time job.?

June 4, 2010 - 10:16 pm 5 Comments

I’m a 20 year old full-time college student with a part-time job (making VERY little). Currently, I live with my parents and everything works out fine. I have a full-ride scholarship and don’t have any student loans. In addition, I’ve saved about $21,000 in various money markets, mutual funds (Janus and Franklin Templeton), and savings accounts. If we bought a home, my parents would totally help me with bills, mortgage payments, etc, plus they would get a tax break (second home).

We’re in no rush to purchase a home, but what would you all recommend considering my situation? Wait a while and stay at home? Keep saving? Purchase a house or townhouse (which one?)? Rent?

Oh yeah, the price range we’re looking at is between $50,000-100,000 for a small home. Also, we live in a safe area with a good school district where homes tend to appreciate.

Thanks for your advice.
Also, I DO have a Roth IRA that is invested in Franklin Templeton- about $3500

If you can afford to buy, I would suggest buying. If you are in no rush to get out of your folks home though, your best bet is to stay put and keep stashing money away. You may want to open a retirement account in addition to what you already have.

BTW – Go you on your savings!! Very few young people are that diligent. Congrats!

Dems – If Obama is elected will be be subjected to more of the same economic policies that gave us a crisis?

June 4, 2010 - 10:16 pm 10 Comments

Regardless of who you feel is to blame for the economic crisis, lets look at the facts:

1) Clinton signed the deregulation bill
2) Jimmy Carter put the Community Reinvestment Act in place
3) Bill Clinton strengthened the CRA and its enforcement
4) Franklin Raines, who ran Freddie, was directly responsible for the creation of "Mortgage backed securities."
5) Franklin Raines fleeced Freddie for over $30 million for his own personal gain.
6) Franklin Raines is on Obama’s finance committee.
7) Barney Frank insists that the CRA was not responsible for this:


8) Watch the dems defend Franklin Raines at:

1) Clinton signed the deregulation bill of wall street. Basically it means that he agreed with it.

Without a doubt. If you look at Obama’s proclamations in this area he will not even allow your house to be repossessed for default. He has even hinted at extending this to your car loans. The man does not believe in personal responsibility and supports a large social agenda. Once the furor dies down and people stop watching the process will renew unabated. At this point I am more interested in seeing what the government will do with the mortgages they buy until such a time as they can sell them. I foresee a large number of neighborhoods getting new section 8 neighbors in the immediate future.

You are aware that Raines has disavowed that he ever worked as an adviser to the obama Campaign… Aren’t you?

June 4, 2010 - 10:16 pm 9 Comments

The Facts

The McCain video attempts to link Obama to Franklin Raines, the former CEO of the bankrupt mortgage giant, Fannie Mae, who also happens to be African American. It then shows a photograph of an elderly white woman taxpayer who has supposedly been "stuck with the bill" as a result of the "extensive financial fraud" at Fannie Mae.

The Obama campaign last night issued a statement by Raines insisting, "I am not an advisor to Barack Obama, nor have I provided his campaign with advice on housing or economic matters."

So let’s say that this dude did give advice to Obama, does that mean that somehow Obama is partly responsible for the Fannie Mae downfall? Why is there so much "guilty by association" accusations being thrown around with this? That’s the GOP for you. However, what they don’t tell you is that McCain’s campaign manager was the pres. of an advocacy group that defended Fannie and Freddie against gov’t regulation, or that at least 20 of McCain’s fundraisers and advisers were lobbyists for the companies, yet, I don’t hold McCain responsible for the downfall of those companies. Again, that’s the GOP for you.

Why did Dems Fight to Allow Fannie Mae to Take On Mortgages without Borrowers’ Income Being Documented ?

June 4, 2010 - 10:16 pm 9 Comments

Was that because they got a lot of donations from their friends who used to work in Clinton’s White House — Jamie Gorelick (Vice Chair) and Franklin Raines (CEO)?

Did the Dems bother to think about the risk they were putting taxpayers in?
Should we send thank you notes to Dems for blocking how big Fannie Mae could become?

Excellent question and one that has not been asked or brought up often enough of late. Congressional meddling had a direct affect on the situation we’re in now. They stripped away much of the market safeguards and lowered the standards for home loan acceptance.

Still, this ALLOWED banks to lower standards. It didn’t force them to as we’re seeing now. They’ve really tightened up. And, the individual is STILL responsible for their own financial decisions. You can’t fix or compensate for stupid.

Want to sell our Townhouse, how do we do it in this market?

June 4, 2010 - 10:15 pm 4 Comments

We bought a brand new Condo/Townhome in Rhode Island in 2005.
Its in a decent area, 10 min from Providence. 40 min from Newport. 50 minutes from Boston. We both lost our jobs last November and are both living on one Unemployment check. With student loans, cars, insurance, utilities, mortgage, credit cards etc… Its all getting to be way too much and we are throwing away everything we’ve saved into this black hole of debt & mortgage interest.

So, we’ve read all about both types of Short Sales, (release of lien) etc.
Foreclosure, Bankruptcy etc…..

I know there is an alternative to rent our Condo/Townhouse out but the market isn’t looking that good for renting (to cover what we’d need for bills & to move) BUT, we want OUT OF HERE! We want to either move back home to upstate NY where our families are from or way down south to FLORIDA where its warm. I don’t even care if we RENT again. I’m SICK OF IT around here. One of the highest unemployment rates and we are depressed and miserable.

So, what is there for us to do?
we had so much student loan bills on credit cards we consolidated into a second mortgage while the market was still good. So, now we have the first home mortgage and a second mortgage. These total $200K the main problem is that we are 1 of 5 condo units. The one on the end went into Foreclosure when its owner skipped the country. NICE! So, with that unit selling for $129K we are screwed!

So we’d short sale and have to get forgiveness for $70K
AAaaaaahhhhhhh……………………………
If its a release of lien, I can’t afford 70K plus all my 50K in student loans and still be left with no house.

What the heck are we supposed to do?
Just want to move…..

Any help would be great!

ps- I’ve tried talking to our Mortgage Co. (First Franklin based out of CA) they are NO HELP. and have straight out told us they won’t do anything unless we are 3 to 4 months behind on payments. Of which we aren’t. We have never missed a payment.
WHY WON’T THESE COMPANIES WORK WITH US THAT NEED HELP? I DON’T GET IT…

My best advice and as frustrated as you are and I will probably get thumbs down. TRY TO SAVE YOUR HOUSE AND CREDIT!!!! A short sale won’t fly with that much money being lost and besides that it will take months before the bank even approves a short sale.

Could you take low paying jobs in maybe the mall or walmart or something and try to work out and save your house? I know you probably didn’t go to school to work getting minimum wage but you will have some money and in the mean time maybe you will meet people who are hiring in your area of studies vs. living on one unemployment check.

Please revise the following for grammer and mechanics:?

June 4, 2010 - 10:15 pm 1 Comment

The Great Depression, the worst economic crisis to affect America, has shaped the conditions of today. Though Americans during the Great Depression faced many problems, the government took action and made several attempts to provide solutions. With attempts such as the Townsend Plan, the government tried to solve problems like unemployment. The Great Depression saw a fair amount of problems and solutions.
Large quantities of problems were faced during the Great Depression. Problems such as starvation and unemployment caused the Great Depression to be a bad time period. One problem that people faced during the Great Depression was starvation. “…for food she depended almost entirely on occasional dinner invitations from her friends.” (Document #3) This describes how this woman ate on rare occasions because she, like most people, did not have the money to afford it. Many people attended soup kitchens and breadlines which were places that offered free food or drinks because many were suffering from starvation. These events took place in large urban areas serving many unemployed people because of the absence of government relief programs during 1932. Doughnuts, bread, soup and coffee are some examples of what were offered. These events were usually organized by volunteer organizations, church groups, or community groups. While going hungry, surplus food couldn’t be sold for a profit. Starvation was mainly caused by the fact that many Americans did not have wages. Unemployment was another problem that citizens faced during the Great Depression. In 1929, the unemployment rate was a little less than 4% but in 1932, it skyrocketed up to approximately 24%. (Document #1) The high unemployment rate made people mobile in order to find jobs as well as food. With 15 million people unemployed, mostly industrial cities in the east and midwest were hit the hardest by this occurrence. By 1933, about 40% of factory workers and 67% of construction workers were unemployed in Ohio. The reason for such high unemployment was because of the stock market crash. At first, people bought many stocks on margin because it seemed the market was going to go up. In reality, these stocks were inflated and build on dreams. As the market went down, banks demanded their money back, forcing people to sell their stocks low. People then rushed to banks to withdraw all their money. Causing banks to collapse, they ran out of money. Only those who were fast enough were able to withdraw their money, which caused many people to lose their life savings. As banks closed, businesses closed as well and left many people jobless. Without wages, people were unable to pay mortgages and rent leaving them on the streets without a home. Without money, food was not affordable and many suffered starvation. During the Great Depression, people suffered because of starvation and unemployment.
The government took action in order to solve the problems presented during the Great Depression. New Deal programs and the Townsend Plan were examples of efforts made by the government to solve these problems. New Deal programs were an attempt to solve problems faced during the Great Depression. A cartoon depicts Franklin D. Roosevelt as a doctor using a bag of New Deal remedies with an elderly woman’s permission to cure a hobo. (Document #6) Franklin D. Roosevelt created many New Deal programs to help the depressed U.S. Congress passed these programs in an attempt to pull America out of the Great Depression by offering jobs directly. These programs helped fight the Great Depression through relief, recovery and reform. Creating jobs, it provided many Americans with an income which helped them get through the depression. Some of these programs also promoted forms of entertainment such as art, music, theatre, and writing. Because of the expensive cost, some programs were closed while others still exist today. This would solve the problem of unemployment. Another solution the government presented was the Townsend Plan. “…over the age of 60 years may retire on a pension of $200 per month on the following conditions.”(Document #7) The Townsend Plan was a plan proposed by Mr. Townsend which provided a pension to the elderly if they follow three provisions. One provision was to “engage in no further labor, business or profession for gain.” This gave the young people more opportunities to get jobs because the elderly no longer worked since they received a generous pension provided by taxes. The second provision was that the person must be free of criminality. They included this because they wanted to reward the people that are good and haven’t done anything bad during the duration of their long lifetime. Also the third provision forces the person to spend their money in the United States on consumer goods or services. This would help stimulate the nation’s feeble economy by creating new jobs.
Therefore, actions were taken by the government to provide solutions for the problems faced du

The essay looks good.. the only concern I have is the way you are citing the sources… generally you would reference by last name or publication depending on the source. What I am going to do, is I will attach a link that I use all the time, and it will show you examples of MLA formatting, hope this helps!

http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/747/05/

Best places to live on Long Island, New York?

June 4, 2010 - 10:15 pm 6 Comments

With good school ditricts, where we can keep our mortgage under $3000…any ideas? What are your thoughts on Valley Stream, Franklin Square and Oceanside?

Finding a home on Long Island with a mortgage under $3K used to be difficult…but now it’s a buyers market. There are so many houses on the market now that costs a lot less than it did last summer.

Here are a few school districts that are great (I’m not familiar with the South Shore..so my list only consists of North):
Herricks, Great Neck, Port Washington, Manhasset, Garden City, Wheatley, Jericho, Syosset.

Like the previous post mentioned its the taxes that make mortgage payments hard. My propery tax is a little over 12K per year…so on top of my mortgage I pay $1000 month in taxes. Most neighborhoods with great schools will have higher taxes. On the plus side, if you work in the city…you won’t get city taxes taken out of your paycheck.

So if you puchase a house for about $480,000 then your mortgage will run about $2300 per month…this doesnt include taxes ( $700/month based on $8500 per year). That would make your monthly payments About $3000.

Don;t forget that you’ll need house insurance, downpayment, closing costs and if its a fixer upper…$$$.

Out of the 3 areas you mentioned I would not consider Valley Stream..its does not have the greatest schools.

trading for a living earn money through internet computer work from home